Incomplete Education

“The education of a man is never completed until he dies.” – Robert E. Lee

The term mandatory continuing professional education often troubles me, even given my profession. That concern deserves explanation. For many people, including the public professionals serve, the word mandatory implies reluctance. It suggests professionals pursue education only when forced. In reality, most professionals actively seek continuing education. Doctors, accountants, lawyers, engineers, and architects value ongoing learning. They embrace CE as a way to sharpen skills and stay current. CE supports professional success and should not feel like an irritating obligation.

Mandatory CE

Mandatory CE rules do affect the business of delivering continuing education. Busy professionals respond to deadlines, and deadlines often drive seasonal participation. However, seasonal patterns do not tell the full story. Many professionals complete more CE than required. They seek learning that directly supports their work and recognize the skills gained through CE. In practice, motivation often exceeds compliance.

Incomplete Education: What Associations can do?

Associations that provide CE must plan around deadlines while ensuring timely access to relevant content. They should push content to members across multiple formats and topics. Sometimes new CE rules drive content creation. Statutes, regulations, or coding changes may also influence development. However, deadline-driven planning alone falls short. Effective CE requires broader strategy and foresight.

Overall

Associations should step back and review CE programs holistically. CE represents more than revenue or compliance. It serves as a core member benefit. Leaders and staff should support members through meaningful education that remains comprehensive, relevant, and timely. The word mandatory may describe requirements, but it should never define the spirit of an association’s CE program.